The Internet may fairly be regarded as a never-ending worldwide conversation. The government may not, through the , interrupt that conversation. . . As the most participatory form of mass speech yet developed, the Internet deserves the highest protection from governmental intrusion. . . The government, therefore, implicitly asks this court to limit both the amount of speech on the Internet and the availability of that speech. This argument is profoundly repugnant to First Amendment principles.
At the stroke of the midnight hour, when the world sleeps, India will awake to life and freedom. A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when we step out from the old to the new, when an age ends, and when the soul of a nation, long suppressed, finds utterance.