Back in the East you can't do much without the right papers, but with the right papers you can do anything The believe in papers. Papers are power.
I would like to invite the citizens of Great Britain and the citizens of the U. S. and the citizens of the world to come here and walk freely through the streets of Venezuela, to talk to anyone they want, to watch television, to read the papers. We are building a true democracy, with human rights for everyone, social rights, education, health care, pensions, social security, and jobs.
Yeah. I mean, it just seemed to me that it was - I felt so helpless to this business of not having any papers. That seems like a throwback to a schoolboy.
I dove on those papers like Sherlock Holmes on a cappuccino binge.
Don't believe stories which you see in the papers about troops asking as a special privilege not to be relieved. We stick it, at all costs if necessary, as long as ordered, but everyone's glad to hand over to someone else. And anyone who says he enjoys this kind of thing is either a liar or a madman.
My high-school papers, my college-application essays, read like Norman Mailer packed in a crunchy-peanut-butter sandwich.
To me, I read good reviews in lots of papers and bad reviews in lots of papers.
We know the "great men" and a handful of heavily cited papers in our specialization. When there is a historical frame around a paper it's often a caricature that has become canonical.
There has been so much rubbish written up in the papers over the years.
I never liked writing concluding paragraphs to papers - where you repeat what you've already said with phrases like 'In summation', and 'To conclude'.
Already the pitch has been reached in Great Britain where it is considered bigoted or reactionary to do other than praise the Jews for their industry and ability. Few papers will risk any attack on the Jews, however well-founded, for fear of appearing even distantly anti-Semitic.
I'm always studying. I probably wrote the most papers of any college quarterback.
I write a syndicated column for The Washington Post that goes to about 200, 250 papers.
Well, all I know is what I read in the papers.
If you do not know what you're doing stacked on his desk, a dozen colleagues Initially sticks with a large number of papers and pass them. In case of doubt, the way in.
I'm not going to have some reporters pawing through our papers. We are the president.
I was reading so much about myself in the papers that was not me.
I don't believe what the papers are saying They're just out to capture my dime, Exaggerating this, exaggerating that.
You don't need papers to vote.
When you are dealing with a mass movement, as opposed to a quote-unquote "elite," you are talking to people who don't have time to read long research papers. You have to communicate with them in sound bites, around every other thing they are doing. So it takes a long time to shift people from one message to the next, especially if your foundational narrative was, "The only one thing in the entire world you should be paying attention to is Darfur. "