In my opinion , every rich man is a miser.
The wholeness, coherence, identity, which we attribute to the depicted scene [in a photograph] is a projection, a refusal of an impoverished reality in favour of an imagined plenitude.
The only pertinent political question in relation to an identity [or its photograph] is not Is it really coherent? but What does it actually achieve?
Looking is not indifferent. There can never be any question of 'just looking'.
It seems to be extensively believed by photographers that meanings are to be found in the world much in the way rabbits are found in downs, and all that is required is the talent to spot them and the skill to shoot them. . . But those moments of truth for which the photographic opportunist waits, finger on the button, are as great a mystification as the notion of autonomous creativity.
Our conviction that we are free to choose what we make of a photograph hides the complicity to which we are recruited in the very act of looking.
A job the artist does which no-one else does is to dismantle existing communication codes and to combine some of their elements into structures which can be used to generate new pictures of the world.
If you've ever made up something on the spot and made somebody laugh, you can credit Jonathan Winters with inspiration.
The living is a species of the dead; and not a very attractive one.
The whole object of the Prophets and the Sages was to declare that a limit is set to human reason where it must halt.
My husband - my king.