Honestly, I think we should just trust our president in every decision he makes and should just support that, you know, and be faithful in what happens.
Film then does not promote socialist revolution in any consistent way.
Terrorism is in good part an effective government propaganda; it serves to deflect attention from governmental abuse toward a mostly imagined, highly dangerous outside enemy.
Today the family is being attacked and defended with equal vehemence.
So begins a question which has of late become more and more urgent: what is the relation of aesthetics to politics?
Film, therefore, is part of society, not distant from it, easy to experience for people regardless of class.
Surrounded by people who love life, you love it too; surrounded by people who don't, you don't.
Tools and techniques ought to be an extension of consciousness, but they can just as easily be a protection from consciousness. Then the tools become defence mechanisms. . . against the unconscious.
You can't just say I love you, you have to LIVE I love you
I'm sure there are people in Hollywood, whose main drive in film is to make money, who will feel that any use of the word hijacking or any reference to anything violent or remotely associated with the terrible tragedy that occurred will lose customers for them. And that will be the only criterion that will matter and so they'll force the minions that work for them to remove these things from their movies, or not make movies about that subject.