Any believable prediction will be wrong. Any correct prediction will be unbelievable.
I don't know anything about politics. I wouldn't put too much into my prediction on politics.
That's not a prediction, that's a spoiler.
The problem is not one of prediction. It is one of imagination.
Contrary to popular accounts, very few scientists in the world - possibly none - have a sufficiently thorough, 'big picture' understanding of the climate system to be relied upon for a prediction of the magnitude of global warming. To the public, we all might seem like experts, but the vast majority of us work on only a small portion of the problem.
It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you there are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period.
It is very difficult to make an accurate prediction, especially about the future.
Prediction is very difficult, especially if it's about the future.
The prediction of nuclear winter is drawn not, of course, from any direct experience with the consequences of global nuclear war, but rather from an investigation of the governing physics.
A plan is an example of what could happen, not a prediction of what will happen.
An experiment disproving a prediction is discovery.
Management is prediction.
The one prediction that never comes true is, 'You'll thank me for telling you this.
Prediction, not narration, is the real test of our understanding of the world.
Global warming isn't a prediction. It is happening.
Science is prediction, not explanation.
Prediction is very hard, particularly when it's about the future.
A mathematician is an individual who believes that prophesying that his dog will die if he deprives it of food constitutes a prediction.
Absolute prediction is completion. . . is death!
Prediction is not just one of the things your brain does. It is the primary function of the neo-cortex, and the foundation of intelligence.