Human nature is almost unbelievably malleable, responding accurately and contrastingly to contrasting cultural conditions.
The structure of the family is not born in nature but in human design. What we can do, we can also undo.
Personal change, growth, development, identity formation--these tasks that once were thought to belong to childhood and adolescence alone now are recognized as part of adult life as well. Gone is the belief that adulthood is, or ought to be, a time of internal peace and comfort, that growing pains belong only to the young; gone the belief that these are marker events--a job, a mate, a child--through which we will pass into a life of relative ease.
Children crawl before they walk, walk before they run--each generally a precondition for the other. And with each step they take toward more independence, more mastery of the environment, their mothers take a step away--each a small separation, a small distancing.
No revolution creates a wholly new universe. Rather, it reflects the history and culture that spawned it.
Society and personality live in a continuing reciprocal relation with each other. The search for personal change without efforts to change the institutions within which we live and grow will, therefore, be met with only limited reward.
In fact, the family as an institution is both oppressive and protective and, depending on the issue, is experienced sometimes one way, sometimes the other - often in some mix of the two - by most people who live in families.
I really wanted our male characters to be a lot stronger. We gave them careers, lives.
A lot of people have fancy things to say about customer service, but it's just a day-in, day-out, ongoing, never-ending, persevering, compassionate kind of activity.
There is a flaw in the operation of representative government. The flaw produces the growth of government.
You won’t be able to take your eyes off the next four presenters: Salma Hayek and Penelope Cruz.