The United States must be neutral in fact as well as in name. . . . We must be impartial in thought as well as in actiona nationthat neither sits in judgment upon others nor is disturbed in her own counsels and which keeps herself fit and free to do what is honest and disinterested and truly serviceable for the peace of the world.
The rights of neutrality will only be respected when they are defended by an adequate power. A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral.
The metaphysical apologia at least betrayed the injustice of the established order through the incongruence of concept and reality. The impartiality of scientific language deprived what was powerless of the strength to make itself heard and merely provided the existing order with a neutral sign for itself. Such neutrality is more metaphysical than metaphysics.
I don't think anyone can answer whether the Fed is going to have to tighten beyond neutral,. . . You have to be looking at the economy going forward and that changes as additional data comes in.
A vendor neutral, standards-based approach must be adopted
There's so much kind of bureaucracy involved with the whole concept of net neutrality and like technical stuff.
Take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim.
Net Neutrality is what makes the Internet so great - and so vital for innovation and creativity.
Let's not let the government sell us out. Let's fight for net neutrality.
Compared with the BBC's studied neutrality, Fox comes across as a kind of Gong Show of propaganda.
Language, journalism, food, sex. All is politics. Even innocent love stories are politics. . . . There is no such thing as neutrality.
I am a big advocate of what is known as net neutrality. This means that providers are compelled to transmit content without political or commercial pre-selection.
We have to ensure free and open exchange of information. That starts with an open internet. I will take a backseat to no one in my commitment to network neutrality. Because once providers start to privilege some applications or websites over others then the smaller voices get squeezed out and we all lose. The internet is perhaps the most open network in history, and we have to keep it that way.
Government. . . may not be hostile to any religion or to the advocacy of no-religion; and it may not aid, foster, or promote one religion or religious theory against another. . . The First Amendment mandates governmental neutrality.
Net neutrality has been in place since the very beginning of the Internet.
Net neutrality is one where we the people are definitely on the ropes.
A person either creates or destroys. There is no neutrality.
You know, the only reason net neutrality is controversial is because it's complicated.
Net neutrality isn't a government takeover of the Internet, as many of my Republican colleagues have alleged.
Neutrality is at times a graver sin than belligerence.