The armament industry is indeed one of the greatest dangers that beset mankind. It is the hidden evil power.
Today when the public thinks of the products of science it is likely to think about environmental problems, an unproductive armament industry, careless or dishonest 'scientific' reports, Livermore cheers for 'nukes forever' and a huge amount of self-serving noise on every subject from global warming to 'the face of God'.
Two conditions render difficult this historic situation of mankind: It is full of tremendously deadly armament, and it has not progressed morally as much as it has scientifically and technically.
The moral is obvious it is that great armaments lead inevitably to war.
Sometimes you may kill tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands with very primitive armaments.
The armament of the government is legal armament. Any other armament is not legal.
Our priorities require that all children of Palestine, men and women, be ready for conflict, both from the standpoint of training and from the standpoint of armament.
If only the authorities could be made to realize that the forces leading them on in the armament race are just insane.
All the vested interests and people who profit by war will - with the journals they control - resolutely oppose any reduction of armaments.
We pacifists have not ceased to point to the grave danger of armaments and to insist on their curtailment.
Limitation of armaments in itself is economically and financially important quite apart from security.
We stand for the dismantling of foreign military bases. We stand for a reduction of armed forces and armaments in areas where military confrontation is especially dangerous, above all in central Europe.
I just want to give a lot of things - and just to respond. I agree with [Hillary Clinton] on one thing. The single greatest problem the world has is nuclear armament, nuclear weapons, not global warming, like you think and your - your president thinks.
The idea of achieving security through national armament is, at the present state of military technique, a disastrous illusion.
It has to be admitted that starving nations never seem to be quite so starving that they cannot afford to have far more expensive armaments than anybody else.
Without armaments peace cannot be kept; wars are waged not only to repel injustice but also to establish a firm peace.
Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Union by increasing armaments.
Let's presume that a country or army has this weapon ; this kind of armaments cannot be used by infantry for example or by anyone. This kind of armament should be used by specialized units, so it cannot be in the hand of anyone.
Do not fear or misunderstand when the Government say they are looking to our defences. I give you my word that there will be no great armaments.
