Indecision may or may not be my problem.
The public hardly suspects that their purchase of cosmetics, pet food, toothpaste, eggs and other common items have, in all likelihood, caused some form of animal suffering.
While anyone who practices a religion has the right to their own religious truths, it doesn't give them the right to violate the welfare of another human or an animal. So, where necessary, it is the task of the government to intervene and curb the freedom of religion.
Politicians and corporations have always placed economic interests above moral interests. This is now hurting the entire planet.
In the past, no one paid any serious attention, even to the existing laws that protect animals.
A lot of animal experiments consider only commercial interests. We want to ban all animal experiments as soon as possible.
Today, we take to task any governmental body that doesn't protect animals, and take legal action if necessary.
News is not a game show. You don't win a car if you happen to be right.
After studying dozens of sexual assault cases, it is clear to me that the "he saidshe said" aspect is a big part of what makes them fraught. Many experts agree with this. But that same fraught nature is reflected in both legal standards of consent and philosophical theories of consent.
I'm a country boy. I'm from Georgia.
I'm just telling you, God permits things in our lives sometimes for reasons that we do not understand yet because of the spiritual level that we're on. We can't have any understanding of it, because we're not at a place of spiritual growth yet where we understand the deeper things of God.