Let's be clear: Has the U. S. ever made any mistakes? Of course. Is the U. S. at all like [Vladimir] Putin's regime? Not at all.
It is possible for leaders or regimes to be cruel, bigoted, twisted in their world views and still make rational calculations with respect to their limits and their self-preservation.
I cannot understand how people can still call themselves Christians and not be furious adversaries of Hitler's regime.
After a regime is removed, however, it is dangerous to leave a security vacuum.
Poles understand perhaps better than anyone the consequences of making toothless warnings to brutal tyrants and terrorist regimes.
Thus the regime has deprived Iranian women not just of their present rights, but also of their history and their past.
In Iran, fundamentalism was fuelled to an extent by the regime of the Shah being supported by the West.
The Shah's regime was an incorrigible regime and after a while, when the revolution happened, the situation began to change, revolutionary conditions was created. . . we simply wanted to change the regime.
I pretty much borrow my entire beauty regime from my mom.
It was the removing of a regime that was hostile, that clearly had the intention of constructing weapons systems.
I will say that the prison regime is rather a good one for a writer because you have plenty of time to write.
The burden is on Saddam Hussein. And our policy, our national policy - not the UN policy but our national policy - is that the regime should be changed until such time as he demonstrates that it is not necessary to change the regime because the regime has changed itself.
The regime of globalization promotes an unfettered marketplace as the dynamic instrument organizing international relations.
The Iraqi regime is a threat of unique urgency. [. . . ] It has developed weapons of mass death.
As so often happens in politics, what appears to be politically expedient for those in power rarely overlaps with the public interest. The lesser evils of the regime become entrenched, while the greater good is never realized.
Regimes collapse when people are no longer afraid and think they're no longer alone.
The economy in Gaza is declining because Gaza is controlled by a terror regime.
The fact that oppressive and corrupt regimes can borrow money in the name of the whole country means that the country's future generations will be weighed down by interest and repayment burdens, even if the money has been frittered away in some frivolous way, embezzled or used for weapons to suppress the country's population.
In the twentieth century the number of people killed by their own governments under authoritarian regimes is four times the number killed in all this century's wars combined.
I've opposed black regimes and white regimes, leftist regimes and rightist regimes. I'm close to Aristide because I have respect for him, but all that is beside the point.