If there is anything in the universe that can't stand discussion, let it crack.
No opinion that cannot stand discussion or criticism is worth holding.
I will call him Small Bob," said Bob. "He is a good monster. " End of discussion. The Titan hefted his spear and they continued marching into the gloom.
[Possible Attorney General] that's a discussion I'd like to have with [Donald Trump].
A new word is like a fresh seed sown on the ground of the discussion.
If the feminine issue is so absurd, is because the male's arrogance made it "a discussion
What the restored gospel brings to the discussion on marriage and family is so large and so relevant that it cannot be overstated: we make the subject eternal!
Killing a bunch of people in Sudan and Yemen and Pakistan, it's like, "Who cares - we don't know them. " But the current discussion is framed as "When can the President kill an American citizen?" Now in my mind, killing a non-American citizen without due process is just as criminal as killing an American citizen without due process - but whatever gets us to the table to discuss this thing, we're going to take it.
The discussion of fur is childish.
With The Myth of Achievement Tests, James J. Heckman, John Eric Humphries, and Tim Kautz have offered a wealth of insightful analysis and brought together a number of topics often treated separately to inform a comprehensive discussion of the growth, character, and impact of the GED that is truly monumental. This is a first-rate book.
I find it scandalous not only that there was so little discussion of the costs of the Iraq war before we went to war - this was, after all, a war of choice - but even five years into the war, the Administration has not provided a comprehensive accounting of the war.
We need a better way to talk about eating animals. We need a way that brings meat to the center of public discussion in the same way it is often at the center of our plates. This doesn't require that we pretend we are going to have a collective agreement. However strong our intuitions are about what's right for us personally and even about what's right for others, we all know in advance that our positions will clash with those of our neighbors. What do we do with that most inevitable reality? Drop the conversation, or find a way to reframe it?
In talking about human rights today, we are referring primarily to the following demands: protection of the individual against arbitrary infringement by other individuals or by the government; the right to work and to adequate earnings from work; freedom of discussion and teaching; adequate participation of the individual in the formation of his government. These human rights are nowadays recognised theoretically, although, by abundant use of formalistic, legal manoeuvres, they are being violated to a much greater extent than even a generation ago.
In any war, the first casualty is common sense, and the second is free and open discussion.
The physical characteristics of the child Jesus will always remain a point of discussion. No artist has ever produced a type, nor ever will, that has in it all that the varying minds of all time will acknowledge as complete.
Everything is part of one web, one matrix of existence, beyond discussion. This is our true self in its undifferentiated form.
Freedom of inquiry, freedom of discussion, and freedom of teaching - without these a university cannot exist.
Every thing secret degenerates, even the administration of justice; nothing is safe that does not show how it can bear discussion and publicity.
Rare indeed is the nature that does not become a little more intense when its own affairs come under discussion.
I am explicitly not opening the giant can of worms that is the ongoing current discussion of patent, copyright, and trademark reform.